I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Что думаешь? Оцени!
。关于这个话题，51吃瓜提供了深入分析
深化机制创新，协同效能持续释放
The committee which advises the government on vaccinations - the JCVI - recommended that all children be given the MMRV in November 2023.